🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". A law may be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," commented one European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "supported by strong data".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, legislation is largely happening at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some individuals to copy this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global debate evolves, the actions of Australia and its followers show that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.